Skip to content

AUSPOLLIEWATCH EVERY CLAIM LINKS TO ITS SOURCE · NOT A SCORECARD

Where Australian parties stand on animal welfare

7 parties on record · party platforms in their own words

Each position below is sourced exclusively from the party's own published materials — never from media coverage. Click a party for its full platform, donors and members. Individual members' own stated positions are on their record pages.

Australian Labor Party party platform

The 2023 ALP National Platform includes a dedicated policy section titled "Humane animal welfare" among its platform chapters, as did the 2021 platform.

Australian Greens party platform

The platform states animals are sentient beings deserving care and respect, and commits to ending live animal export, phasing out intensive farming practices inconsistent with animals' behavioural needs, and establishing an Independent Office of Animal Welfare with a uniform national legislative framework for animal protection.

Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party party platform

The party supports the live sheep export trade and opposes the federal government's ban on live sheep exports, stating the ban threatens thousands of jobs and hundreds of farms.

The Nationals party platform

The party's plan states Australia has the world's best animal welfare standards and commits that a Coalition government's first Agriculture Bill will reverse the ban on live sheep exports by sea and protect the live cattle trade, arguing that exiting the live export market is counterproductive because other countries do not maintain the same standards.

Animal Justice Party party platform

The party opposes the exploitation of animals through farming and slaughter for meat, dairy, eggs, fibre and fur and supports phasing out animal agriculture toward plant-based and cellular agriculture; interim measures include rapidly phasing out and banning factory farming (including aquaculture), mandatory independently monitored CCTV in factory farms and slaughterhouses, banning live animal export, phasing out farm animal mutilations, and ending subsidies for animal agriculture.

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party party platform

The platform states that animal welfare policy in NSW has become distorted by animal rights ideology and that compliance for animal welfare issues should be returned to accountable government authorities. It states the greyhound racing industry provides economic benefits to regional communities and expresses support for measures to sustain its long-term viability.

Democratic Labour Party party platform

The party's live animal exports policy states it is not opposed to live exports only if humane treatment of animals in transit and in the receiving country can be guaranteed; since policing treatment in other countries is unlikely, it prefers to "err on the side of the animal" and proposes that animal products for export be processed in Australia under humane conditions and exported as finished products.

Recorded divisions on animal welfare · 9

Every recorded vote on a bill filed under this issue, in each parliament the site holds a division record for — second and third readings, plus any amendment listed with a reason. How each member voted is on their record.

Votes are shown as the official record lists them — Hansard federally and in New South Wales; Votes and Proceedings, Minutes of the Proceedings and Hansard in Victoria; the Record of Proceedings in Queensland; the Votes and Proceedings and Minutes of Proceedings in Western Australia; the Votes and Proceedings (House of Assembly) and Hansard (Legislative Council) in South Australia; the Votes and Proceedings of both chambers in Tasmania. "Did not vote" means the member held the seat that day and is on neither list — the record says who was in the chamber, not why, so it is never an abstention. Western Australia’s record prints no pairs, so a member paired there shows as did not vote. Nothing is shown for a presiding officer who by law gives only a casting vote (the Speaker and the President in South Australia, the President in Tasmania), nor for the member presiding at a Tasmanian division, which Tasmania’s journals record. Which bills sit under which issue is an editorial choice, made bill by bill with a reason read from the second-reading speech. A bill decided by an earlier parliament (Queensland’s 2018 abortion law reform, for one) is shown with that parliament named, read from the official record of the day. For Queensland and the federal parliament “did not vote” there means the member held a seat that day, as their service is recorded; for the other earlier parliaments the record of who held a seat could not be read, so only the printed Aye, No and paired votes are shown.